Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Dove Feather

Little Dove Feather was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete

Totally non-notable. - Ta bu shi da yu 14:44, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: vanity. The author then created three separate articles on misspellings of the screen name, each linking to the first and to the others.  Geogre 15:07, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Aargh. Why do people think this is relevant to the rest of the world? --Ianb 17:41, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * It isn't. Delete all. - Lucky 6.9 18:02, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete! No doubt about it. -[[User:Frazzydee|Frazzydee|&#9997;]] 18:03, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete it- definitely. Pointless and boring.-BlackAlbino
 * Comment: the original poster of this page keeps blanking it - could this qualifiy as a speedy? --Ianb 16:30, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Comment: Yes, if it's the author doing it. With IP's, it's hard to be sure. Geogre 18:43, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Comment: it's the author User:Charlizegraciedylan, --Ianb 19:08, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 06:34, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. anthony (see warning) 20:53, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)

It's me, Charlizegraciedylan.

I did not create it for self-promotion. I created it because it's connected to the next item I tried to make, CATS. I did not know that there was an item on CATS already so I inluded a part of an article written about it. And since it was said that I should mention sources, I did, so that's where the name came in the article. I only wrote it first because it was shorter and faster to type. As for the "misspellings", I thought I'd include them for as far as I know about encyclopedias, they provide information about authors, including other names. What I did with it was what I intended to do with my other entries, provide as much info as possible. If you will trace them, so far, all my entries are connected to CATS.

As soon as I saw the comments, I actually tried to delete it, at least, the content, so there wouldn't be anything to debate about anymore. In fact, there wasn't anything to debate about at all as everyone thinks/thought it was all done with "malicious intent", anyway. But it keeps coming back as I was told I was not the writer of it or something, so you know, don't delete. But I was the writer and it's in "my contributions" section. I was hoping I wouldn't have to explain myself at all as I liked Wikipedia, but as it is...Here I am.

I used Charlizegraciedylan as my name as an "editor" here and did not even include a link (like my homepage) for it not to be mistaken as self-promotion. I seriously doubt people would be searching for the name anyway.

So okay, I made a mistake and shouldn't have done that. So I apologize for anybody who got confused, upset, annoyed, scandalised, enraged, or whatever, by it. So okay, I'm vain, vain, vain. I'll just accept that...Now that that's settled, let's move on. So do what you will and what is just and what I've been trying to do the whole week: DELETE IT ALREADY.

Thank you for your time, your discussion, and for the brief stay as "editor", which I actually enjoyed, despite my being vain and unimportant to the world. More power to Wikipedia (and I actually mean it, as I'm not a liar, at least, just probably vain). Now everybody happy. Goodbye.

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.