Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Engine Moving Pictures


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 02:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Little Engine Moving Pictures

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a film and television production company, making no strong claim to passing WP:CORP -- as written it simply posits the existence of the company's projects as inherited notability, which it isn't. And there's no reliable source coverage to support it, either -- all we have is a contextless pile of external links to the company's own webpage, its IMDb page and the separate IMDb pages of its principal partners, as well as two brief news blurbs which are about the shows and not the company. Which means the sourcing is not good enough to pass WP:GNG, and the substance isn't claiming anything that would grant them an exemption from having to pass GNG. Also the article was created by a user named "Merkennedy", suggesting a conflict of interest since one of the firm's partners is Maria Kennedy. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 19:17, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. st170e talk  19:48, 20 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as nothing at all actually suggesting its own solidly independently notable article. SwisterTwister   talk  22:18, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:18, 22 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can't find enough to show where this company would pass NCORP on Wikipedia by itself. Now it's possible that the article for Mazzotta could pass notability guidelines if I merge the content from this article into that one (which I've already done) and if I find enough coverage for him to make up for what the company is lacking. If that happens, I'll return and change my "vote" to a redirect. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not pass WP:CORP. Tom29739 [ talk ] 20:56, 27 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.