Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Smoky-Newark Watershed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 20:41, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Little Smoky-Newark Watershed

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Per this. Hike796 (a supposedly banned user who hasn’t been unblocked, see the recent WP:SOCK entry for US40AL-01) recreated the deleted category in article space. Shannon talk   contribs  21:45, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:43, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:30, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per Pfly in the discussion for Hot Creek-Railroad Watershed. Clearly this lacks notability as would be expected when you try and create articles for over 200,000 items listed in a database. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:50, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-notable HUC, Little Smoky Valley and Newark Valley could potentially have individual articles, but no reason to mash them together outside of the USGS classification. Kmusser (talk) 17:54, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.