Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little chef Kicha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that the sourcing in existence either isn't reliable or in-depth enough to show notability Nosebagbear (talk) 18:28, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Little chef Kicha

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:N. Subject has appeared on TV a few times and has allegedly received some (non-cited, non-significant) 'awards'; i.e. aboslutely nil WP:NOTABLE achievements. Existing citations are from non-reliable web chat and 'news' sites including Mashable, Huffpost, digitalspy, etc.. So delete. -- Smerus (talk) 19:20, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:12, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:12, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 14:32, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Little indication of notability. Dorama285 17:40, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, qedk (t 桜 c) 07:17, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm skeptical of the argument that HuffPo isn't a reliable source to help establish notability. Regardless, a Google news search shows a number of other sources, including Times of India, NDTV , and The Times . —Ost (talk) 22:03, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Ost, see WP:HUFFPO. The Times snippet is just borrowed to make up a compilation article. The other stuff (Times of India and NDTV) is mainly about him being on the Ellen Generes show, not in itself sufficient to make him WP:NOTABLE.Smerus (talk) 14:28, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete we need really good indepth sourcing to justify having an article on a ten year old, we do not have that here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:33, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep: There is no general consensus for the reliability of Huffington Post, and Digital Spy is considered reliable. I also found these two articles, from The Times and The Times of India; thus, I believe there is enough to meet WP:SIGCOV:
 * →https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/the-hottest-young-chefs-in-the-world-txddb528m
 * →https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kochi/little-chef-kicha-when-i-said-i-wanted-to-touch-his-shiny-head-steve-harvey-burst-out-laughing/articleshow/64176212.cms
 * Dflaw4 (talk) 13:36, 3 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Passing mentions are not enough to establish notability. KartikeyaS343 (talk) 16:28, 4 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.