Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Littlest Pet Shop (TV series)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. Fram (talk) 10:54, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Littlest Pet Shop (TV series)

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Delete per WP:CHRYSTAL and Ten Pound Hammer's Law. Another possibility is a merge into Littlest Pet Shop.  Nolelover  It's football season!  19:16, 30 October 2010 (UTC) TenPoundHammer has rewritten the article. It did exist in the 90's.  Nolelover  It's football season!  02:22, 6 November 2010 (UTC) Sorry if I didn't make this clear with my first note, but I am withdrawing the nomination.  Nolelover  It's football season!  15:36, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources, wikipedia is not a crystal ball. A merge would be a good idea when/if the show is confirmed. --Elassint (talk) 19:54, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: This TV show actually aired in the mid-1990s and had a few episodes out on video. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 00:08, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * While we're at it, Rewrite as well to reflect this. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 00:14, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * delete pure WP:CRYSTAL, nothing's decided yet. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 00:27, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and rewrite per Slgrandson. If it did exist in the mid-1990s, that version is certainly notable. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 02:15, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  --  Jujutacular  talk 06:47, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep after rewrite. The crystal ball argument doesn't apply for series that have already been aired, and the current version has sources. J I P  &#124; Talk 09:49, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Needs rewrite, but definitely notable. Ng.j (talk) 03:56, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per nominator's well reasoned withdrawal and the rewrite that shows that the article is indeed not crystal.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:49, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I actually remember this even though I would have been in my mid teens and shouldn't have ever watched it. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:56, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.