Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LiveWatch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 18:56, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

LiveWatch

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

unremarkable company, references are mostly ciscumstancial Zeus t&#124; u &#124; c 22:42, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 3 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete I'm afraid I have to agree. I'm not finding really any worthwhile coverage in the third party arena, other than it exists.  I don't think the Inc 5000 listing qualifies for WP:GNG.  Would listen to arguments the other way.--Paul McDonald (talk) 01:10, 3 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. and per Paul McDonald. Almost all the mentions are incidental, such as the quote from Brad Morehead in the Broadband Communities Magazine article. Even the Ledger-Enquirer about safety in Columbus, Ohio, in light of a facebook post, only mentions LiveWatch/SafeMart once at the end of the article as the "putatively unreliable" source of the Internet rumor. no significant coverage, and being #4325 in Inc.'s listing is no great shakes. --Bejnar (talk) 20:01, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete insufficient evidence of notability. The Columbus material is insubstantial.  DGG ( talk ) 06:13, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.