Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live At The Cardiff Capital Theater


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 05:16, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Live At The Cardiff Capital Theater

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable bootleg album. The Real Libs-speak politely 00:27, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

The album has been officially released this article is not about an illegal bootleg. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakecrane (talk • contribs) 01:52, 30 June 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Comment: If we keep this, its spelled wrong, should be Capitol, not Capital.--CastAStone//₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€ 03:13, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete This fails WP:Music because it has never been reviewed or indeed covered in any way by a reliable source: "All albums must meet the basic criteria...with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." I can certainly verify its existance with reliable sources Rolling Stone Billboard Vh1, but I can not find 1 review that is not a customer review on Amazon. Not a single one. It is literally a bootleg that Geffen apparently decided to buy the rights to and release, although due to a lack of reliable sources, I can't verify that.--CastAStone//₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€ 03:13, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - The album has been reviewed in reliable sources. Here is a review at allmusic. Rlendog (talk) 20:33, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * And contrary to the nom, the album is an official release on a major label. Of course, the spelling of the title should be corrected. Rlendog (talk) 15:18, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:30, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. It's a major-label release by a notable artist; it's not just a compilation of previously released material; there's enough information for an article.  ReverendWayne (talk) 15:43, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. I see that the article has been moved, but that only fixed one of the two spelling mistakes in the title. I don't want to confuse things by creating a double redirect during an AfD discussion but that should be sorted out if the article is kept. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.