Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live at the On Broadway 1982


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Scott Mac 14:01, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Live at the On Broadway 1982

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Does this bootleg recording meets the notability criteria for albums?  C  anniba loki  23:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:37, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment (Undecided) - This one is confusing as I can't figure out if the album is actually a bootleg or maybe an old official release that was poorly promoted. But the fact that I can't figure this out after a whole mess of searching might indicate a problem with notability, as the album has not been discussed (at least online) beyond some fan blogs and download sites. But on the other hand, a record company of unknown legitimacy is releasing the live album on CD later this year and it will be sold through real retailers like Amazon (see ). I'm undecided thanks to all this confusion. -- D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 18:17, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - The lack of any coverage in reliable sources is a big problem. I am not sure of what to mack of the Amazon listing. It shows this as a November 2010 release, but as an MP3 release.  so not really an album in the traditional sense.  -- Whpq (talk) 13:09, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 02:08, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. It's just an MP3 album, but does anyone care much about physical CD's anymore? It's an important album by a major band. It's for sale at amazon.com, which I guess indicates that if it was originally a bootleg it's probably been legitimized at some point, as I doubt that Amazon sells illegal material, at least not knowingly. So that makes it part of the band's published corpus and thus as legitimate as article material as any of their albums, more or less. Herostratus (talk) 05:06, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as nominator and due to lack of significant independent coverage in reliable sources.--  C  anniba loki  06:01, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - per Herostratus - Theornamentalist (talk) 17:16, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.