Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liverpool Daily Post & Echo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Liverpool Echo. Courcelles 17:22, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Liverpool Daily Post & Echo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There are already separate articles for the Liverpool Daily Post and Liverpool Echo. There's no need for an article with a summary of both. TheBigJagielka (talk) 11:59, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 12:12, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 12:12, 24 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Liverpool Echo. This article predates the separate ones which originally redirected here. Later this article was split but unfortunately leaving three articles. The two individual articles are actively edited and the Liverpool Post has recently closed down. "Liverpool Daily Post & Echo" should be kept as a likely search term for the one-time company and there is no need to delete the history. Thincat (talk) 14:56, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect - As per above, this article is an unnecessary content fork. Eduemoni↑talk↓  18:38, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.