Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liverpool Tart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fails WP:GNG. Passing mentions, listacles and a few localized publications doesn't meet GNG.

Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Deletion review - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays! Missvain (talk) 17:27, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Liverpool Tart

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No evidence of any notability. No sources provided and searches find no support from any RS.

The original creator notes on their Userpage that "promoting the "Liverpool Tart" confection which he discovered in a village web-site" which clearly suggests a non-notable  recipe.

A mention on a National Trust site and an inclusion in a recipe blog site both appear to be almost direct copies of this article. Without evidence of dates for the external sites, it is possible that the copying may be from those sites to Wikipedia in which case it would also be a copy-vio.

Even if this is an accepted recipe in some other sources, there is nothing here to indicate notability. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 15:45, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  Velella  Velella Talk  15:45, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Velella  Velella Talk  15:45, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep I've revamped the article and found significant coverage in reliable sources. Mujinga (talk) 19:00, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Still not notable. Wikipedia is not a recipe archive!!! Nwhyte (talk) 19:52, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment. Wondering whether this is Citogenesis. Is there any published mention of "liverpool tart" prior to the appearance of the 2009 English Wikipedia article? (Edit: the sole original "source" appears to be the photo in a 2006 news article).Alexbrn (talk) 15:15, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - I do not even know where to begin. Suffice to say this dish barely rates a mention on Google. No idea why it would be on Wikipedia. Does not meet WP:GNG, should definitely be deleted. Such-change47 (talk) 10:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete sources added are either passing mentions, list articles, or recipes . Hardly the significant coverage required for WP:GNG. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:35, 22 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.