Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lives and portraits of all the presidents from Washington to Grant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 11:42, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Lives and portraits of all the presidents from Washington to Grant

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly written article. No references, no categories. Doesn't really have enough meaningful information for the user to do anything with it. I submitted this to CSD but the CSD was denied and it was suggested that it be submitted through AFD instead. Kumioko (talk) 10:59, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. No attempt to demonstrate notability. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:13, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per RHaworth. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 13:22, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, but I think this article should have gone through WP:PROD instead, to save time and resources. Edge3 (talk) 14:52, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 10 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - non-notable publication with no references. Stalwart 111  03:19, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable, if their were one or two more deletes, I would WP:Snowball per Edge3, Sadads (talk) 18:35, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - non notable, no significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. — Joaquin008  ( talk ) 14:50, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.