Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Livin Foul


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Wax (rapper). May meet NALBUMs but clearly fails GNG, As noted below the article needs sources which for this album there's a lack of, Nothing to merge (or worth merging anyway) so closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 23:51, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Livin Foul

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Indie artist, indie album, fails WP:NALBUM. MSJapan (talk) 18:25, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - Barely passes WP:NALBUM by charting in Billboard's Rap Albums chart. —SomeoneNamedDerek (talk) 22:45, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:56, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:56, 5 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep or redirect - chart placing is prima facie notability, but redirecting to discography section of artist page with a ref for the chart placing would preserve the information and work just as well for readers - David Gerard (talk) 09:47, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm not sure why I couldn't get that charting, because I looked, but what's interesting is that the chart placement is there if you look at the link given, but the chart itself for the date only goes to 15. I'm also not 100% sure that the rap chart is uncategorically "charting" - there's some wiggle room with genre charts, based on the fact that reaching #1 on a chart that needs 50K sales to get there is not the same as one where it needs 5000.  We've had the same issue with the New Age charts, so I wouldn't rubber stamp it if that's the only thing we have. MSJapan (talk) 14:13, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * It's a perfectly valid minor chart for the purposes of WP:NMUSIC to establish prima facie notability. But as I noted, we need actual sources, else it'll be just as useful as a chart reference on a discography listing - David Gerard (talk) 15:01, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 *  Keep or merge - Keep or merge to Wax per WP:CHEAP. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:37, 12 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.