Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Living Essence Foundation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 03:41, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Living Essence Foundation

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable foundation with no reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 00:03, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 00:07, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 00:07, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Article neither establishes notability nor has indpendent reliable sources. John Carter (talk) 00:09, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge into article on founder, Arjuna Ardagh, who has a respectable number (40) of gbook hits not written by him.John Z (talk) 02:24, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * delete as non-notable, and the same for the author. This group/person seem very keen to promote themselves.  Sticky Parkin 02:38, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * merge per john Z &mdash; goethean &#2384; 00:26, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment As there are no reliable sources for this article, there is nothing to merge. The foundation is already listed on its founder's article. Its website can be noted there. As there are no reliable sources that assert this foundation's notability, I feel that it should be deleted. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 21:46, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete this and Merge any non-redundant info to the founders page.Yobmod (talk) 12:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.