Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Living Ethics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Agni Yoga. (non-admin closure) clpo13(talk) 08:03, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Living Ethics

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This pseudoscientific attempt to justify Agni Yoga has received zero notice in the relevant academic fields on which it claims to offer relevant commentary. Per WP:NFRINGE and WP:FRIND, therefore, Wikipedia cannot host an article on such a subject. jps (talk) 14:06, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * keep, Cleanup. .we have plenty of articles on various kookery. WP:FRINGE applies to use references to kookery in other articles, i.e., we cannot describe teaching of Living Ethics in the article "Life". But notable kookery os OK to be described in article about itself.  - üser:Altenmann >t 17:06, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep with cleanup or Merge to Agni Yoga. Certainly fringe, but well-established. There must be sources attacking it though, which should be added. Johnbod (talk) 17:32, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:59, 18 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Merge to Agni Yoga. Insofar as there's any coherent text in the Living Ethics article, it does say that the two terms are equivalent. Tevildo (talk) 12:23, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * There's something notable here, but merge to Agni Yoga looks the best option as it stands - David Gerard (talk) 09:36, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.