Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Living in the Plastic Age


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. withdrawn (non-admin closure) Mkdw talk 07:17, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Living in the Plastic Age
The result of the discussion was Keep. I'll ask Ajsmith141 to improve the article. Withdrawn by nominator. EditorE (talk) 01:04, 29 April 2013 (UTC)


 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article may be necessary to delete, like the articles Elstree (song) and Clean, Clean I had previously nominated. Despite some chart performance in the UK, along with in the Netherlands and Bangladesh that isn't even included here, a music video of song, and a cover of this song by a less-famous metal band, it's still not enough to have it's own article, because there's no critical reviews and in-depth info on this song I could find. Another problem is that there's more info on the music video than there is on other info of the song. EditorE (talk) 15:40, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are several possible outcomes here, and others should be considered before deletion. There isn't much here that's sourced but this was a #16 hit in the UK and would have received print reviews in the music mags of the era. Please consider alternatives such as merging before bringing articles to AfD. --Michig (talk) 16:24, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  18:37, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
 * That could be true. However, the only review I was able to find was on Fine Print Magazine, and I was unable to find any facts or articles on the making of this song. According to Wikipedia's song notability guidelines, a song may have it's own article if it "has been the subject of [multiple], non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label." EditorE (talk) 20:10, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.