Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liviu-Mihai Pavelescu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar ⨹   13:26, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Liviu-Mihai Pavelescu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There doesn't seem to be any biographical info on this inventor; patent descriptions like these ones don't suffice for writing a sound article.--Mihai (talk) 03:32, 26 February 2015 (UTC) Mihai (talk) 03:32, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:37, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG, looks like he's just a guy doing his job. It appears article was created to disambiguate from this person: Liviu Mihai. I considered saying redirect to SympaTex, as that seems to be who he's working for, but we don't know if he still works there. In the meantime, I changed the text of the article to say that he helped invent a waterproof shoe, not the waterproof shoe, as that seems patently ridiculous. Valfontis (talk) 13:20, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see any basis for an encyclopedia article here. Just someone who existed and patented a shoe. Am I missing something? --Michig (talk) 08:33, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.