Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liz and Pete Fordred


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:58, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Liz and Pete Fordred

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:BLP1E, basically, for lack of sustained coverage. First source is primary (authored by one of the subjects), second is a review of the book and not independent coverage of the couple themselves, third is another primary source (guy on his own website talking about meeting them), fourth (working link here) is also by Liz Fordred, and the final one is basically a book review. What we don't really have is sustained significant independent coverage of the Fordreds themselves. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 16:55, 30 October 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:02, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Zimbabwe-related deletion discussions. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 16:55, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 16:55, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete no sustained coverage in RIS. Mccapra (talk) 20:29, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete lacking third party coverage to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 23:54, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No sustained coverage. – The Grid  ( talk )  16:53, 12 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.