Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liza del Sierra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 09:59, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Liza del Sierra

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No awards, only nominations. No independent, reliable sourcing. No reliably sourced biographical content. PROD removed without substantive explanation or article improvement. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 00:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete' Fails WP:GNG.LM2000 (talk) 01:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - Meets the requirements of WP:PORNBIO. Also, well known, 94 million results in Google and articles in few other Wikipedias. Subtropical-man (talk) (en-2) 15:33, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * WP:GOOGLEHITS is not a reliable indicator of notability. That is especially true with pornography where floods of matches are common. How many of these 94 million hits are not porn sites? Very few from the samples that I got. As for PORNBIO, a single nomination that is not scene-related is not enough. Being named by a magazine as one of the 100 hottest porn stars (right now) is not a significant achievement. • Gene93k (talk) 20:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails PORNBIO per my comments above. Reliable source coverage to pass GNG not found in search. • Gene93k (talk) 04:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.