Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lizbeth Goodman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW and also WP:HEY. (non-admin closure) ‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ Geschichte (talk) 12:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Lizbeth Goodman

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not appearing to meet WP:NOTABILITY standards. Avishai11 (talk) 00:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Avishai11 (talk) 00:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:05, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:05, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:06, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:06, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Plenty of book reviews (now added to the article) give her a pass of WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:42, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per, meets WP:AUTHOR. Jfire (talk) 02:09, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: book reviews etc. I thought we might have been combining information about two different people, but her uni profile confirms a career moving from Shakespeare to Prof of Mech Eng.
 * Keep poorly supported by current sources but passes WP:AUTHOR. Theroadislong (talk) 11:53, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Recent edits by David Eppstein and PamD clearly demonstrate notability. --Grnrchst (talk) 12:20, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep – author of multiple widely-reviewed books in reliable sources (see WP:NACADEMIC #1 and WP:AUTHOR]] #1). I recommend that the proposer reads WP:PROF and WP:AUTHOR (especially WP:NACADEMIC #1 and WP:AUTHOR #1 in this case) before proposing further academics/authors for deletion, remembering that an article may need improvement rather than deletion. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 12:22, 21 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.