Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ljubba


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Singu larity  03:57, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Ljubba

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Possible hoax. Neither source even mentions Ljubba, and there's no real assertation of notability anyway. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 16:25, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks like a possible autobiography, sources are nonsense.  Acro  X   16:28, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Probably even qualifies for a speedy deletion. Hqb (talk) 16:37, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-Notable and a possible hoax. Article is about a 16 year old. Probably fails WP:BIO also.-- RyRy5 ( talk ) 16:45, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - I put the CSD on at first, but he removed it. Might as well leave it off as this is obviously going to be deleted.  a s e nine say what?  16:54, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete Editor has a conflict of interest Antonio Lopez  (talk) 16:58, 25 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Probably vandalism; the sources do not mention the article, and the content is dubious to say the least. PeterSymonds (talk)  18:36, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete vain vanity in vain. JuJube (talk) 21:13, 25 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong delete Ah, the vanity article. Considered this one prime for deletion once I saw "16 year old" and "YouTube". treelo  talk 23:07, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Person lacks any notability at present. Appears to be a clear vanity article which was created by the author. see here Artene50 (talk) 02:01, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment The creator and subject of the article, Ljubba, removed the AFD notice from the article at 16:49, 27 May 2008 . A few minutes later I found the article via recent changes and, not seeing the AFD notice, speedily deleted it at 17:04, 27 May 2008 under WP:CSD category A7 for no assertion of notability. Ljubba re-created it and I re-deleted it at 17:06, 27 May 2008. Ljubba had also blanked his talk page, removing the notification of the AFD nomination. Since I was unaware of this AFD, I have restored the article to its status right before I first speedied it, and re-added the AFD template, so the AFD process can run to its conclusion and be properly closed. Edison (talk) 20:19, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of or claim of WP:notability.Edison (talk) 20:19, 27 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.