Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lllama


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  15:50, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Lllama
What the? Even if it is verifiable does it really need its own article? *Francs2000 15:55, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It seems unneeded. If it is, then it should be merged into Ogden Nash. j o s h  b u d d y talk 16:38, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Oh please, do we need an article for every made-up word found in poetry?  That will be another million articles!  Slowmover 22:12, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Strond Delete as absolute nonsense. Eivind 23:09, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN - Hairy Dude 23:50, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Appreciative delete. Pooh.  &middot; rodii &middot;  03:27, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - could merge to Ogden Nash but I doubt they'll want it.   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  21:25, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.