Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lloros del Alma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Lloros del Alma

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I had prodded this as a not notable book of poetry by a not notable author. It was deprodded with the edit summary, "adding information." There is no intimation of notability in the article. It's in Spanish. What I could piece out did not seem to indicate significance. I washed it through a translator program and posted on Talk:Lloros del Alma. Just a book review with a hint of promotional tone. No hint of notability. I don't think the 9 Google hits represent significant coverage in reliable sources. I see announcements, Facebook, totally unrelated pages, other poems with the phrase "Lloros del Alma" (tears of the soul.) I'd have speedily deleted, but there is no criterion that fits.  Dloh  cierekim  14:32, 24 January 2009 (UTC)   Dloh  cierekim  14:32, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.   --    A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 15:47, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.   --    A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 15:47, 24 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete: Self-promotional article based on an opera prima of an unknown 21 years old poet (claimed). The page is also written entirely in Spanish.--Darius (talk) 16:18, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. While being in Spanish is not a suitable reason for deletion, this is a self-promo piece for a non-notable book. -Yupik (talk) 00:50, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * OH my. I did not mean to imply Spanish as a reason to delete. Just wanted to warn others a head of time and lead them to the translation on the talk page. Cheers,  Dloh  cierekim  01:42, 27 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.