Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lloyd Robinson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  howch e  ng   {chat} 07:32, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Lloyd Robinson
Reads like an autobiography or a biography written by a close family fried, and although the guy has a neat hobby, most of the information in the article cannot be verified, and I think he fails to meet the biography criteria, delete--nixie 23:21, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep and cleanp. May be notable as president of the Federation. Need some Australian input. -- JJay 00:52, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Deletebeing the one time president of the caving federation is not notable enough for wikipaedia.--Porturology 02:04, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - I tried to clean up the article at some point, and while it had a fairly sympathetic POV towards the subject, he is sufficiently notable to deserve an encyclopedia article. -- Rune Welsh | &tau;&alpha;&lambda;&kappa; | Esperanza  02:06, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.  -- Humansdorpie 21:27, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment - don't all the recent problems the mistakes in biographies of living persons lift the bar for verfication - most of the deatil in this article cannot be verified.--nixie 22:44, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not only is he not overly notable, but this entire article is completely unverifiable. Ambi 22:54, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per Ambi's reasonings. Roisterer 02:23, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete -- unless references backing up article can be sourced. - Longhair 06:16, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Ambi. Sarah Ewart 10:03, 24 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.