Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lo Mejor de... SELENA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. per SK1 & all that fun stuff (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 17:48, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Lo Mejor de... SELENA

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable album release that is based on speculation and fancruft and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, the article should be deleted until it actually makes it on the Billboard charts. jona  (talk)   19:28, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

- The album was barely released. I think you are just being unfair! Madonna's album Rebel Heart had an article a month before it was released! If she can have one Selena can! And Selena's album is already released. It's currently on iTunes charts. Just because your an official editor doesn't give you the right to act like the King of wikipedia! Lo Mejor de... SELENA should NOT be deleted! This user is being unfair to me! 19:36, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFFEXIST is not a valid argument, secondly Rebel Heart is a studio album that has multiple reliable sources that followed its anticipated release, this is a greatest hits album that may or may not impact the Billboard charts. Also, iTunes is a not an accepted music chart here on Wikipedia. I do believe the album may chart on Billboard, but we don't speculate that on Wikipedia. Best, jona   (talk)   19:40, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

And other greatest hits album such as For You that album's article was created without a deletion way before it was released. and this album has multiple sources such as, Universal Music Latin Entertainment (the record company that released the album) and amazon. Do you need anymore?? What your being is unfair to the fullest
 * Can you please sign your name after you post a message? Again WP:OTHERSTUFFEXIST is not a valid argument. UMLE is not a reliable source for its own album releases because it is biased and Amazon is not a reliable source at all, so yes can you please provide sources that tell readers why this article merits its own article here? I am not being unfair, if Wikipedia decided to allow any album by any artist to have its own article we would have tons and tons of non-notable articles with nonsense; not saying that this album and its content is nonsense. Wikipedia has guidelines on music (see WP:NALBUMS for further information). jona   (talk)   20:08, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Delete Pretty much what AJona1992, plus it fails as a standalone article per WP:NALBUMS. Erick (talk) 21:51, 5 April 2015 (UTC) EDIT: Changed to keep per AJona's comment below. Erick (talk) 15:29, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Delete per AJona1992 and Gene93k plus WP:CRYSTAL. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 01:13, 6 April 2015 (UTC)  EDIT: Changed to keep per AJona's comment below. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 16:06, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Withdraw deletion: the album has peaked on the US Billboard 200, Top Latin Albums, Regional Mexican Albums, and the Latin Pop Albums chart. jona  (talk)   23:05, 9 April 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. Relisting comment: The nominator has withdrawn, but an outstanding delete !vote still exists.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:38, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.