Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lobachevsky (song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) TonyBallioni (talk) 16:44, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Lobachevsky (song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nonnotable silly joke of a song Staszek Lem (talk) 00:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * withdrawn After David Eppstein rescued the article. Staszek Lem (talk) 16:28, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:43, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:43, 27 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. It will be a sad day when all silly jokes have been removed from Wikipedia and only serious affairs are left. This is indeed a silly joke, but I think a notable one. It's included in the ODQ, and a column in Billboard was devoted to it some 50 years after it was published. That, I think, demonstrates both ongoing significance and a pass of WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:31, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * well, thanks for rescuing it. I put it for deletion not because it was silly, but because the article demonstrated no notability. Staszek Lem (talk) 16:29, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep The references show that the song is notable and we do not delete articles just because the topic is "silly". Cullen328  Let's discuss it  16:17, 27 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.