Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locations in Hogwarts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge into Hogwarts. I will notify the HP project to proceed. Neil  ☎  10:31, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Locations in Hogwarts

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Crufty, in universe context that cannot be solved by editing, cannot be cited from reliable sources Pilotbob 04:55, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, disagree with both "cannot" premises. Fee Fi Foe Fum 05:46, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Fee Fi Foe Fum (I smell the blood of a Wikipedian?). In particular, reliable sources are easy - the Harry Potter books and movies are perfectly good sources, as are various secondary publications. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 06:56, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction & Fantasy-related deletions.   --Gavin Collins 11:16, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to Hogwarts per WP:FICT. Absolutely no notability outside of the HP books. By the way, the Harry Potter Notability WikiProject has already agreed to merge this article into Hogwarts. – sgeureka t•c 11:34, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Then lets close this AfD as a no-concensus keep for now, if it hasn't been merged in a while we can reopen this AfD. Fee Fi Foe Fum 08:16, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge, per Sgeureka; I tend to trust projects' judgement in these matters. --Gwern (contribs) 19:21 26 October 2007 (GMT)
 * Delete, we don't need articles about every child's fake universe. Oh, wait, we're in it right now, it's called wikipedia.  Mindraker 19:42, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * LOL
 * Can we try to keep the tone a bit... eh, never mind, wasn't a big deal. Anyway. It bears noting that that's as inaccurate a characterisation as it can possibly be. This is about the best-known fictional setting of this time and of all of history. --Kizor 16:11, 28 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Transwiki If there isn't a wiki4fiction there should be.jonathon 04:34, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as nominated. Lack of reliable seconary sources suggests these fictional locations have no notability outside of their fictional setting. --Gavin Collins 11:08, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge by the WikiProject Harry Potter editors sounds good to me.--Alf melmac 11:12, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Transwiki and redirect to Hogwarts - There seems to be no real world information of any kind, and no promise of any, so its just a lot of plot summary, and as we already have articles on the books themselves, this is just duplication. Judgesurreal777 03:34, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:FICT. Extremely unlikely anything on this list has received substanstial coverage from secondary sources. Moving the information somewhere else on Wikipedia will do nothing to increase notability. Doctorfluffy 23:18, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note - user indefinitely blocked as disruptive sockpuppet. — xDanielx T/C 22:25, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.