Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locations in Jericho (TV series)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 01:14, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Locations in Jericho (TV series)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is mainly original research and trivia. Anything relevant to the series can be covered within the episode list. TTN (talk) 18:48, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- TTN (talk) 18:49, 22 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep This looks like a proper spinout article that would overwhelm either the immediate parent article on the TV series or the episode list. Miami33139 (talk) 19:04, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - I don't think AfDs should be used to enforce redirects. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 02:52, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Combination articles are the proper way to go for these, trying to remove them does not help reach  compromise solutions.     DGG ( talk ) 04:44, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per DGG. Jclemens (talk) 02:05, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete This is fancruft and trivia pure and simple. Eusebeus (talk) 15:04, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Excessively detailed plot summary and fancruft. No indication the locations in this series have received direct significant coverage. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 22:25, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as proper WP:SPINOUT of plot elements that would overwhelm the parent article. Not OR as the series itself is the source and is verifiable by anyone. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 18:46, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Doctorfluffy. Rray (talk) 23:40, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Excellent well sourced sidebar article. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 01:42, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Well sourced? I see a fan wiki and a dead link. Can you clarify? Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 19:41, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Edit: are you counting the list of episode tidbits in the body as sourcing? Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 19:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete once again I must disagree with DGG, we should not be in the business of hosting excessively detailed plot summary and fancruft such as this. JBsupreme (talk) 05:57, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - original research / compilation. No evidence this issue covered in independent sources. Mukadderat (talk) 22:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.