Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locations in the Lone Wolf series


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete all. Kudos to the nominator for his work and finding a reasonable solution (transwiki) that respects Wikipedia's policies & guidelines. &mdash; Scientizzle 16:16, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Locations in the Lone Wolf series
Also nominating the following;
 * Magical objects in the Lone Wolf series
 * Races and groups in the Lone Wolf series
 * Characters in Lone Wolf series

These articles were part of my attempt to expand coverage of the Lone Wolf (gamebooks) series, and unfortunatelly, it was before I understood things like notability and out of universe perspective. These articles and their contents have all been transferred over to the Lone Wolf wiki at Wikia, so it is safe to get ride of them on wikipedia and redirect these pages to the main Lone wolf article, Lone Wolf (gamebooks). Judgesurreal777 00:39, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete delete per nom, as well as other pages.--NightRider63 01:45, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge the magical objects to the book they're primarily associated with, merge the races and groups to the characters article, and trim the character article. i said 02:21, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all per request of article creator and primary editor. --Jayron32| talk | contribs  03:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Remember to tag all the articles you nominate for deletion with an "AFD" tag, and place redirects to the prime AFD page in the subsequent redlinks (now done.) Also, which Wiki was the content transwikied to? The Lone Wolf Wikia seems to have little activity, but I saw there was a fair amount of activity at this Lone Wolf wiki. The Lone Wolf series is fairly minor, and probably does not justify a large number of side articles, but I have no real opinion on this. Sjakkalle (Check!)  11:56, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I wasn't sure how to make them direct here....also, perhaps that wiki is currently more active, but the point is that the information in these articles will still be available online and will not dissapear. Judgesurreal777 17:37, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.