Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locbook (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 08:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Locbook
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and appears to fail the notability guidelines. Alpha_Quadrant   (talk)  19:52, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can see no evidence that this is notable; there are no reliable third party sources. The style of writing also suggests a mild promotional nature: "With the popularity of free software and the lack of it available for the petroleum wholesale market, the developer released the suite as a low-cost alternative." With the notability issue, I don't think the software is really important enough for a Wikipedia article. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 20:40, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The three references look nice until one sees that they are used to source advertizing boilerplate. The rest seems to come entirely from the publisher. Mangoe (talk) 21:39, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 7 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, nothing that seems independent significant coverage. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 20:40, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence the subject is notable. Couldn't find anything to grant notability. The 3 provided references have nothing to do with the subject. Pit-yacker (talk) 21:25, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep I work for a competitor so I would like to see the article deleted, but to be fair this is the only free software product for its target industry and I know the industry very well.174.252.244.142 (talk) 16:57, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 18:39, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: No notability shown since the December AfD. SL93 (talk) 23:12, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.