Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lochap

please dont delete this, it is for a website, which has a big forum community. I see no reason to delete this page


 * this web site is not big at all. it doesn't seem like an appropriate encyclopedia topic.possible selfpromotion? delete - Mattingly23 16:24, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * This article is only a few minutes old, and is the user's first contribution. I'm explaining to the author why articles about their friends is not a good idea. To the author - please read your talk page, and discuss this issue there. DJ Clayworth 16:27, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Might be best to delet this, lochap.com isn't very important nor very big. Im gona have to agree with the other people, this really should be deleated. Sorry for the inconvience. -jjrh (site admin of lochap.com)

ok, sorry sereal, just tryin something new, lol


 * Feel free to stick around, guys. We can be pretty fast on listing things on Votes for Deletion.  Take a few minutes to get familiar with the policies, set up an account, and please keep contributing, within policy bounds.  You can also list personal information, including favorite research sites and the like, on your user page, once you set up here.  Don't get discouraged, and welcome to Wikipedia. (Delete the entry, though, for being a web review/guide.)  Geogre 17:28, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)


 * Comment jjrh, thanks for not squawking. Now that you have seen how easy it is to create and edit Wikipedia articles, we hope you'll stick around and try your hand at doing more. We don't really mind new people trying things out just to see how they work, even though we prefer that they do their experiments in the sandbox. I really don't think lochap.com is notable enough for an article, so I'm not encouraging you to expand this one. I think it would be a frustrating waste of effort. But, just so you know the rules... it's perfectly all right to edit and improve an article while it's under discussion in Votes for Deletion and quite a few articles end up with "Keep in present form." But the consensus on this article will probably depend much more on the notability of the website than on the quality of the article. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 01:44, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete. Might be a website; might be a forum; but it's tiny and unencyclopedic. 17 registered members. Atlantium has them beat by over 40x. ;) --Golbez 19:49, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * delete. nonnotable --Jiang 23:04, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia isn't a webguide. Average Earthman 10:16, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable enough. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 01:44, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete more web forum vanity. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 05:45, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)