Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lock, stock and barrel

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Dmcdevit·t 06:01, August 13, 2005 (UTC)

Lock, stock and barrel
Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Copied to Wiktionary and transwikied the only link. I don't feel that a redirect is indicated. Robert A West 23:09, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

I "created" the article by migrating the relevant text from the flintlock article because as a phrase (as opposed to a mere word) it would get more exposure categorized as an English phrase. If this is migrated to the Wikitionary then I can envison quite a few other phrases going there as well, no?--Hooperbloob 02:06, 5 August 2005 (UTC)


 * It's not like this would be the first article to do so. Other articles can always external link to the wictionary page. Transwiki. &mdash; RJH 15:25, 5 August 2005 (UTC)


 * With no disrespect to your effort, I feel that the proper place for this, and nearly all other English phrases, is Wiktionary, per WP:NOT. Hence, I went to the effort to do everything that I am allowed to do boldly, for all three phrases in flintlock and then came here.  Robert A West 16:21, 5 August 2005 (UTC)


 * I really don't care one way or the other. I suggest that we put a cautionary note on the Category:English phrases then to ensure that it doesn't grow with improper entries. Perhaps a VfD on that category will get a good discussion going. --Hooperbloob 16:38, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
 * You mean CfD, I assume. A fiew of the articles look good, but most need to be merged/transwikied.  Sigh!
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.