Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lock-N-Stitch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:50, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Lock-N-Stitch

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

References are either to a patent or to a simple listing, online I did find this but that alone doesn't seem to make this qualify. Drewmutt ( ^ᴥ^ ) talk  23:46, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:31, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:31, 24 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG and I also removed a lot of unnecessary material from the article. -- HighKing ++ 15:06, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) There are no worthwhile redirect targets. Eye close font awesome.svg czar  00:02, 1 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.