Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lock Legion

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 23:58, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)

Lock Legion
Parity with Clock Crew. Doesn't appear to be notable. &mdash; Xezbeth 15:04, May 28, 2005 (UTC) =I'm not referring to you (Xezbeth), but to anyone else coming here to vote, and I didn't say "If you put my article on VfD", I said "If you refuse to offer debate". I know putting something on VfD is not neccesarily a personal attack, I just want to establish why people keep doing this to my articles so I can improve. To reiterate: anyone who wishes to vote, please read the talk page and discuss the issue there before voting. If you cannot give a reason, then what business do you have deleting my article unless it's a personal attack?
 * Keep: it IS notable, actually. See the bottom of the talk page for the Lock Legion article for reasons why, and discuss the issue there before casting any votes. I am fed up with these pages being deleted with insufficient reason why and request an actual debate on the topic before a decision is made. If you refuse to offer debate and delete this article regardless, I am going to assume the reason you are not giving an answer is because you don't have one, and are doing this as a personal attack, in which case I will take appropriate measures.
 * Listing an article for VfD is not a personal attack. I'm simply cleaning up after the deletion of Clock Crew, and this article happens to be related to it. &mdash; Xezbeth 19:58, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * delete not notable. Dunc|&#9786; 20:02, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Your article? -- Cyrius|&#9998; 21:49, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

=I've had a brainwave. As I've discussed previously, groups like these are mainly popular on Newgrounds. So why don't we create a section either in or linking to the Newgrounds article about popular animations on Newgrounds? It would be like a detailed list of some of the most important groups and animations from Newgrounds and why they are so important.
 * Delete - as mentioned on the Talk page. --FCYTravis 20:41, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - vanity/plea for attention. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 21:49, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, because I'm offended at being told that if I vote delete it's a personal attack. RickK 23:13, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Further justification at the article's Talk page. ESkog 23:21, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn Xcali 01:04, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Not encyclopedic. Rlw (Talk) 01:07, May 29, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn. --W(t) 01:11, 2005 May 29 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, forum vanity. Megan1967 04:29, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Newgrounds. --EvilZak 06:02, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Quale 07:35, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable. JamesBurns 11:35, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable -CunningLinguist 00:16, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.