Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lock and Key


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. &mdash; Scientizzle 04:00, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Lock and Key

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Completing unfinished nom by User:Hammer1980. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 00:42, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per WP:CBALL. Unsourced & unverified.  Nothing to help out on the notability issue. - Rjd0060 (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete: WP:CRYSTAL. No Reliable Sources (WP:ATT) - fails notability criteria. Wisdom89 (talk) 03:18, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. JJL (talk) 04:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per above - ¿Amar៛ Talk to me / My edits 11:01, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

If I say where I got this info it will have less chance of being deleted, right? -> (her blog, it's about a third down the entry) and the amazon page for this book. I just took bits from both. Carma91 03:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.