Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lockboxer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 01:06, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Lockboxer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

References provided are either mentions-in-passing or rely almost exclusively on company produced material and/or quotations (fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND). Fails WP:SUSTAINED. Website seems to be owned by a Chinese company now, so looks defunct anyway. Edwardx (talk) 17:33, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 18:19, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 18:19, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete this article can be recreated if the subject becomes notable enough to be the subject of dedicated articles in WP:RS. --TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:03, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep The two existing articles (2 other RS are deadlinks) get us toward a GNG since they detail the subject at the level of a dedicated article even though they are not dedicated articles.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:26, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:13, 2 April 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - not enough coverage to pass WP:GNG. Web site is gone - is this even a company any more? TimTempleton (talk) (cont)  00:20, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:49, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: A WP:SPA article by . There appears to have been a sequence of ventures: Lockboxer, Moveboxer, and most recently Salesboxer. (See the recent Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moveboxer, which had been created by another WP:SPA.) Regarding Lockboxer, the August 2011 coverage is typical start-up coverage describing the proposition. Not enough for WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 08:20, 9 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.