Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locke LeCruset


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 20:14, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Locke LeCruset
Prod removed by author. I cite this line of text about the subject: "Locke LeCruset is a fictional character appearing in several short stories written by Zachary Adam, many of which have gone unpublished outside a few scope of fan-boards." After prod removed, another sentence was added: "(Though an analogy will avialable in hard-copy in January 2007)." I'm not sure what to make of that, but, at best, it's claiming it will be notable at a later date, and WP is not a crystal ball. My google searches of "Locke LeCruset," "Locke Le Cruset," "Lock LeCruset," and "Lock Le Cruset" return no results. GassyGuy 15:53, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Update: This doesn't affect the nomination, but I thought I'd add that my research shows that this character is fanfic from the forum Final fantasia. I don't know anything about fanfic fora, so I won't prod that article, but request that someone else look it over as, to me, it seems non-notable. GassyGuy 16:31, 20 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, nonnotable fictional character. NawlinWiki 16:09, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not known outside the forum it calls home, and crystalballism. The forum page reads like an ad. AfD for that forthcoming. --DarkAudit 16:50, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:WEB.  Final fantasia should be AfD'd as well.  --ColourBurst 16:51, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Agreed and done. --DarkAudit 19:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Too much about a too-little-significant character. BuckRose 16:56, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fanfic. Delete Final fantasia as well per ColourBurst. Danny Lilithborne 22:48, 20 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.