Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locked in Lace


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-04 04:30Z 

Locked in Lace

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article claims notability, but nothing is sourced and doesn't seem to meet WP:WEB criteria, at least not that I can discern. RJASE1 Talk  04:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. A decent number of hits on Google, but they seem largely self-referential or a part of a list of links.  Certainly nothing that can be used as a reliable source regarding notability or importance. Arkyan 16:14, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Gender bending fun and games article lacks reliable and independent sources. Promotes a website. Inkpaduta 18:55, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete; unless this has outside media or academic coverage, its not notable in an encyclopaedia. John Vandenberg 03:31, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Strange and apparently directed towards promotion of a website and discussion group, rather than of a recordable and objective phenomenon or event. Also appears to lack objectively independent sourcing. -- Simon Cursitor 07:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --pIrish 22:00, 2 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.