Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lockwood Analytical Method for Prediction


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 13:25, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Lockwood Analytical Method for Prediction

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:NOT includes not being for essays. While a very detailed essay...that's not what Wikipedia is for and therefore this has no place here. Tyrenon (talk) 18:33, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is either WP:OR or a copyright infringement of a published text. Passportguy (talk) 18:41, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not quite original research but definitely non-notable. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a how-to guide or a publisher of original thought. TN X Man  18:48, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Even though I haven't followed all 12 steps, I predict that this article will be deleted for lack of verifiability and no evidence of notability. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 20:23, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:13, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.