Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loco Locass


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. -- ( drini's page &#x260E;  ) 07:46, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Loco Locass
Has 89,000 google hits but someone needs to establish why they are notable. Are they? I'm not sure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blnguyen (talk • contribs)
 * Speedy keep - Loco Locass has a CRIA Gold certified record: source. --Muchness 11:19, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. &mdash;Crypticbot (operator) 15:31, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Muchness. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-13 06:26Z 
 * Yep, Keep. I've added the citation to their page. -Colin Kimbrell 20:40, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. They're notable because they released three albums. They are a band, they toured, they released albums, thus they are deserving of an entry. They're now part of the history of the Canadian music scene. I mean who decides whether a band is notable or not? Based on sales? Radio play? Fanbase? What? This article has to stay. Know I know about WP:BAND. My vote is still unchanged since they meet the criteria for notability. --Dogbreathcanada 04:39, 15 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.