Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locomotives of the Stockton and Darlington Railway


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:56, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Locomotives of the Stockton and Darlington Railway

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An WP:INDISCRIMINATE collection of excessively detailed information about the assets of a company that appears to have been defunct for over 150 years. GretLomborg (talk) 22:06, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Block with extreme prejudice Andy Dingley (talk) 22:32, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * See WP:ANI Andy Dingley (talk) 09:37, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:58, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:59, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  94rain  Talk 03:59, 18 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep as the topic passes WP:LISTN and its age is irrelevant per WP:ITSOOLD. See also WP:ATD; WP:BEFORE; WP:NOTPAPER; WP:PRESERVE; &c. Andrew D. (talk) 07:16, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: pointless resisting deletionist.Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:12, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, completely meritless nomination. This content is standard coverage for historic railways and readily supported here by sources, regardless of whether the nominator is personally interested in this level of detail. postdlf (talk) 14:28, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, the S&D was the world's first commercial railway to use locomotives instead of horses. Several of the locomotives listed were crucial in the early development of steam locomotives. RobDuch (talk) 21:10, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment The level of detail in this article strikes me as similar to that in Articles_for_deletion/Java_EE_version_history, for instance. - GretLomborg (talk) 23:47, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * One is an extant mainspace article and the other is a deletion discussion. If you mean Java EE version history can we have a temp undelete? for us non admins? Thankyou.  Djm-leighpark (talk) 03:30, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I don’t see the relevance, really a very poor example of WP:WAX. postdlf (talk) 15:25, 19 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep, meets WP:LISTN, article reflects this with references included from a number of books. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:29, 19 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.