Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locs Sunglasses


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Nakon 05:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Locs Sunglasses

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested prod. Original reasoning was: Page is entirely original research. A search for sources also fails to demonstrate the notability of this style of sunglasses. 00:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)


 * I disagree with this proposed deletion the style of locs sunglasses has been cited multiple times below in the refeerence links describing 1) hip hop fashion. and as well as its inclusion in actual hip hop songs referring to the actual style. In addition to a image displaying locs sunglasses being worn by a subject ( easy E ) mentioned in the song and a caption describing the style of sunglasses. In my personal experience and my understanding of urban pop culture musical and fashion trends just as stated in the article these are a staple of the hip hop more urban community. And I would say it seems as a slippery slope that there may be a bias against this article based on that fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lilpetetat2me (talk • contribs) 21:06, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 10:51, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 10:51, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (vent)  @ 13:12, 24 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete. WP:ADMASQ. Pax 01:03, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, only (talk) 03:59, 1 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per . This is an advertisement masquerading as an article or at least the improper use of Wikipedia as a soapbox to proclaim how great this item is. --Mr. Guye (talk) 00:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.