Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locstein


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 14:21, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Locstein

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable firm with no refererences to establish notability, with potential WP:ADVERT and WP:COI issues |► ϋrбan яeneωaℓ  •  TALK  ◄| 20:28, 22 June 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Additionally, the only reference I could find, called seriously into question the legitimacy of Locstein. See an investigative piece from the Mirror: "'Leading' money firm Locstein Asset takes on lying cheat Matt James."  From my own research I could find very little to establish that this is a credible organization.  It does not appear to be registered as would a typical financial services organization in the UK.  I am very skeptical and noted that this fail on a number of other fronts as well |►  ϋrбan яeneωaℓ  •  TALK  ◄| 20:33, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.