Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locus Technologies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Complex / Rational 21:01, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Locus Technologies

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails the notability guideline for companies. All sources are press releases or otherwise non-independent. Creator has obvious COI as founder. Previously proposed for deletion, but removed without addressing sourcing issues. – Teratix ₵ 18:40, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Software,  and California. – Teratix ₵ 18:40, 6 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete per my own search. With $7.3 million in sales (according to getlatka.com, a blacklisted, non-reliable source), this is a little outfit. Also, it's unusual for the CEO of a successful, notable company to edit their company's article - just not on their agenda. -- A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 18:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - I find absolutely nothing that meets WP:ORGCRIT an would even suggest to tag as speedy. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:13, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non notable company - looks very local and insignificant to me. No eligible sources found.Onetimememorial (talk) 22:10, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:24, 13 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.