Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locus in quo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation. North America1000 16:39, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Locus in quo

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This page is nothing more than a dictionary definition, and I see no way that it possibly could be anything more than that. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 06:27, 25 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:48, 2 December 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 06:27, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge to Lex loci. There are actually about a half dozen terms like this which are all variations of lex loci or terms relevant to its application, and we would be better off merging all the short ones together. I have now proposed this at Talk:Lex loci. BD2412  T 06:57, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 02:23, 26 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.