Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locws International


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete, consensus is that the article fails the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 16:34, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Locws International

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:ORG.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 13:05, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete blatant self promotion by nn org Mayalld (talk) 13:09, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, weakly - an arts related charity ought to have some kind of showing in the press, and Google News knoweth it not. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:22, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * No opinion. Google News archive actually brings forth what appear to be a fairly large number of relevant citations, some of which sit behind paywalls, unfortunately.  - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:24, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - I think most of those are for a different organisation with same initials, the UK Arts Org seems only to have local news hits and passing references in artists CV's -Hunting dog (talk) 08:13, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:35, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:35, 25 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 02:57, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - only claimed as local in scope and apparently not notable. -Hunting dog (talk) 08:13, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, notability not proven. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 14:53, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.