Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lodge Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Lodge Records

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Creator objected to deletion back in 2006 saying that they were going to add sources to show notability... My WP:BEFORE search is mostly just coming up with stuff about Black Lodge Records. There is a Portuguese record label of the same name but that seems barely notable either. Unless I'm missing something, this fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:54, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:54, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:54, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:54, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete this is the type of total lack of any independent sources that is so common of record label articles. Not every record label is notable, we need sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:23, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The label only ever put out one release, by the band Clubbed to Death. Does not rate as one of the more important indie labels per WP:MUSIC. Chubbles (talk) 19:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete They released one album 15 years ago? This is not notable. Oaktree b (talk) 02:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources and only a few sentences long. Also per Oaktree, one album is not notable. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 23:32, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The arguments for deletion made by the editors above are sound ones. There is no way this label has the kind of notability needed to justify an article on it. Dunarc (talk) 21:34, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Article without any sources is not notable.LucyLucy (talk) 05:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a directory, topic fails NCORP.  HighKing++ 13:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.