Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logan Bohbot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Should anyone want this restored to draft or user space to work on please let me know. Michig (talk) 08:44, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Logan Bohbot

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Blatantly fails WP:MUSIC and WP:GNG. Unencyclopaedic language, not that that matters at this point :P FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  00:01, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Draft-ify Created just yesterday. Send it through AfC to give the editor a chance to add sources. LaMona (talk) 03:12, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Curro2 (talk) 07:22, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Style of writing has been improved upon and article has been reduced to stub to give editors the opportunity to provide more sources.Cleojason (talk) 09:26, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    12:21, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    12:21, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The deletion rationale is lack of notability. No amount of sources will matter when the subject is non-notable. If he achieves notability in the future, submit a draft through AfC. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  14:45, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Logan Bohbot meets the criteria at WP:MUSIC for notability. He has a number of references about him which are independent sources., , , , . Most of the articles that were published about him were done when he was just 16 years of age. Someone who was still in High School and was already getting that coverage? If that is not notability, then I would like to know what is. He dropped his debut album at just 17 and it rose to No. 42 on the iTunes electronic music chart. At that young age, he opened for Hardwell who was then number one DJ in the world, and currently number 2 in the world.. With the sources present before us, I do not think deleting this article is the right course to take.Cleojason (talk) 16:53, 9 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete; everything is just primary sources, news reports about what he's up to at the moment. If that is not notability, then I would like to know what is.  Notability is appearances in secondary sources, stuff published years after he pops into the news, whether by general historians, music historians, people studying the history of the area where he's from, etc.  Nyttend (talk) 20:05, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Is it mandatory for the publications to be made years after? That is neither stated in WP:MUSIC nor WP:GNGCleojason (talk) 21:27, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Works created at the time of an event are primary sources, by definition; secondary sources are those that rely on the primary sources, and given the speed of the publication process, it will be essentially impossible for secondary sources to be published before a few years pass. Nyttend (talk) 07:11, 10 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete and draft & userfy if needed as this is sourced but I'm not sure if it's a solid article yet. SwisterTwister   talk  23:31, 9 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.