Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logan City Jets


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No prejudice towards a merge discussion. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:07, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Logan City Jets

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable sports team, founded last year. No independent showing of notability. Neutralitytalk 19:08, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge to Female Gridiron League of Queensland. I think the topic is better served if we pool our resources and develop one good article about the league and its clubs. Even as the first major premiers in the league, I don't see enough for a standalone article about this team. —C.Fred (talk) 21:01, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep The Logan City Jets are the FIRST team to win a championship in the FIRST sanctioned women's American Football league in Australia. If this were a men's team we wouldn't even be having this discussion. The problem with history is it is often written by men with bad memories or who were not present. The historical significance of this team cannot be diminished by the fact they were founded last year. Not notable? Tell that to the women on the Logan City Jets who proudly lifted the championship trophy for the first time in a sport now growing rapidly across Australia. We have the opportunity by getting history right. Keep the Logan City Jets. Future generation of female gridiron Warriors will want to know who were the first. Pgollan (talk) 22:32, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * "If this were a men's team we wouldn't even be having this discussion." Likely true: it would have been speedy deleted already under CSD A7 as a non-fully-professional team in a non-top-level amateur league and also for not meeting WP:ORG. The fact that it is the first women's team in Australia gives it enough appearance of notability that we're having this discussion. —C.Fred (talk) 02:12, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * None of this has any bearing on notability, Pgollan. There is no reliable, independent, significant external coverage. Neutralitytalk 14:40, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note to closing admin: This user created the article. Neutralitytalk 14:40, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 4 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:27, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:04, 18 September 2013 (UTC)


 * keep It's not much, but it does appear to pass WP:GNG through some of the sources. Needs editing/cleanup, but appears to be notable.--Paul McDonald (talk) 13:55, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.