Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logan Lee Watts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:38, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Logan Lee Watts

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable academic - more of a CV then anything else. PRehse (talk) 13:10, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:34, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:34, 3 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. A clear example of WP:NOTLINKEDIN. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 14:23, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Assistant prof., average citation metrics – there's nothing to indicate he passes the average professor test and there's no coverage that would count towards the GNG. The article itself is also overly detailed and promotion, and with gems like "at the age of 14, his martial arts instructor encouraged him to become a junior coach" and "he achieved the rank of Eagle Scout" there is no way that there isn't a COI here. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 14:51, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet our inclusion criteria for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:21, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Early-career academics should use their departmental homepage for self-promotion, not Wikipedia. Famous  dog   (c) 11:27, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 9 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.