Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logan Miller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  22:21, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Logan Miller

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced BLP. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources provided or found. No significant roles. SummerPhD (talk) 02:18, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: The article is sourced, he has had roles in a tv movie which he starred in, and will star in an upcoming TV series. He also had a minor role in a film. GreenBayPackersfan09 (talk) 10:17, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - "Will star..." is not notable, nor is the minor role. The source (singular) is not independent. This leaves him (supposedly) starring in a non-notable production without significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Not notable. - SummerPhD (talk) 05:24, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable actor who's only roles are minor. Deserted Cities 04:19, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:37, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:37, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:24, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Weak Keep Not a ton of roles, but seems to meet basic notability criteria. Played the younger version of a lead in a studio film, and has apparently been cast in a large role for a Disney TV show. Seems to meet basic notability. Agreed that additional RS other than IMDB and Disney are greatly needed, though. Whitespider23 (talk) 05:11, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Article has zero independent reliable sources. IMDb is not a reliable source and Disney is not independent. Thus, he is not the subject of "substantial coverage in independent reliable sources" by any measure and is not notable. - SummerPhD (talk) 12:26, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Additionally, the roles are minor or in non-notable productions. - SummerPhD (talk) 12:29, 23 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep or redirect to the upcoming TV show he's starring in. He's not really notable now but he's clearly going to be, when the TV show starts (it's already in production). Maybe this defies WP:CRYSTAL but it seems pointless to delete it just to create it again in a few months; at least if it becomes a redirect, the history's still preserved as a starting point. Propaniac (talk) 15:54, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment When he becomes notable, he will be notable. At the moment he isn't. As for the TV show, that article is also lacking: it cites nothing but a press release, which is not "substantial coverage in independent reliable sources". So, we have someone who (we think) will be notable when the currently non-notable show comes out. At the moment, though, we don't have the coverage we need. - SummerPhD (talk) 16:04, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * You know, you really don't have to respond to every single opinion, especially when you're reiterating the same statements made in that opinion, or reiterating the exact same words you've written several times. Anyone reading this discussion is well aware by now that Logan Miller has not apparently received "substantial coverage in independent reliable sources." Also, there's no question that a flagship program on a major cable network will be notable. Propaniac (talk) 19:22, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.